轩辕剑之天之痕

How UK Bill Shields Mainstream Media & Axes Russian News Under Guise of Press Freedom_我的网站

A |     

　    一键部署OpenClaw        数据无价。网站被攻击、服务器宕机、硬盘损坏——任何一个意外都能让你的多年积累化为乌有。    "Social media is now the main source of information about the world for 16-24-year-olds, and for all ethnic minorities in the UK," explained Ellis Cashmore, honorary professor of sociology at Aston University in the UK.,"Yet platform moderators have practically unrestricted power to edit, and, if they wish, remove content. This is an unheard-of censorial power. I can't think that, in history, proprietors have ever had such colossal power to control the flow and content of information, not just to one population, but to the world.",The Online Safety Bill was first introduced in the British Parliament in March 2022 with the aim of holding social media platforms, search engines and various websites to account for hosting illegal activities or spreading harmful content.,The newly introduced amendment is "designed to guard against the arbitrary removal of articles from journalists at recognized news outlets when shared on social media platforms," according to the UK government's website. The authors of the amendment draw attention to the fact that half of British adults use social media for news, with Facebook*, Twitter and Instagram* being the most popular platforms. When it comes to 16-24 year-olds, the internet is the most-used platform.,Once the bill comes into force, social media giants would be required "to ensure recognized news publishers’ articles remain viewable and accessible on their sites even if they are under review by moderators.",Facebook Doesn't Know What Happens to Users' Data, How It Spreads as Regulators Tighten Their Grip27 April, 19:01 GMT,The introduction of the new amendment can be explained by the fact that the tech giants have proved themselves impossible to control, the professor explained.,"Tech companies operate in a relatively unrestricted way and governments around the world usually rely on the companies' goodwill," he said.,Still, the new amendment is focused on so-called "category one companies", which include "the largest and most popular social media platforms", and is not designed to shield alternative media sources.,The bill's selective approach has been manifested by its earlier amendment obligating social media platforms "to proactively look for and remove disinformation from foreign state actors which harm the UK." It specifically singles out Russian news, with an obvious reference to Sputnik News and RT - both previously banned by the EU and social media giants after the beginning of the Russian special operation to de-militarize and de-Nazify Ukraine.,"Freedom of speech and expression are highly valued principles in western Europe and North America," says Cashmore. "But it is interesting that, after the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine, there were no protests at the decisions of western governments to prohibit broadcasts and news supplies from RT, Sputnik and maybe a few less important news outlets.",EU Bans Work of Sputnik News Sites, Broadcasting of RT TV Channel in the Community From 2 March2 March, 11:53 GMT,The professor notes that wiping Russian news from the media sphere is senseless given that many westerners are interested in learning Russian perspectives. "This does not mean they would be persuaded or even influenced, but they feel entitled to make up their own minds independently. They have been denied that facility," Cashmore stressed.,"Since February, Russia, its people and its values have been condemned, denounced and stigmatized," said the professor. "Vladimir Putin has been personally vilified. It is difficult to see this ending, at least not for 30 years. Russia has been excluded from many world affairs and many believe Russia and the other BRICS countries may coalesce into an international configuration to rival NATO. This would become a new world order.",Meanwhile, the bill's amendments have raised concerns among British campaigners who are warning the government that in its current form the proposed internet safety laws are “on the verge of being unworkable," according to The Independent.,In particular, campaigners have advocated for a number of measures to strengthen freedom of expression and rights safeguards to better protect people from marginalized backgrounds and expand transparency requirements on firms to boost access to data for researchers and academics.,*Facebook and Instagram are banned in Russia over extremist activities.。越来越多的站长选择用海外服务器做异地备份，但选什么样的服务器才划算？    为什么用海外服务器做备份？    相比国内云厂商的OSS或对象存储，海外VPS做备份的优势在于：数据完全自主管控、不限速跨境传输、无限扩容、多端同步。而且成本往往更低——很多海外VPS年付只要几十美元，给的硬盘还特别大。    备份服务器的核心需求    大硬盘：备份需要大量存储空间，优先选大容量HDD或大容量SSD方案    大流量：备份同步会消耗大量流量，选不限流量或高流量配额的产品    稳定性：备份服务器不需要高性能CPU，但需要稳定不掉线    低成本：备份不是生产环境，能省则省    推荐方案    入门级（个人站长/小团队） ：
日本云服务器1核2G，2M CN2带宽，月均17元。

B | 适合个人博客、小型网站的日常备份。

C |     标准型（中小团队） ：
美国云服务器2核4G/50G SSD/5M CN2带宽，年付451元。适合中小团队日常备份Git仓库、数据库。    大容量型（大量数据备份） ：
美国大硬盘VPS，E5 2650配置，8核16G，月付约570元。适合外贸图纸、产品素材、视频资料等大容量文件存储。    进阶玩法：多节点备份    真正的容灾，是数据同时存在多个地理位置。主站放美国，备份放欧洲；或者主站放香港，备份放新加坡。一个节点出问题，另一个节点立刻顶上。    一句话建议：备份服务器不需要多高的配置，但硬盘要大、流量要足、价格要低。花小钱买安心，这笔账怎么算都不亏。

申请创业报道，分享创业好点子。

D | 点击此处，共同探讨创业新机遇！。

E |

Current article:http://rqy.ruidunguizanpaorangchongouxia.sbs/gdz9a9j/20260826/81700.html

Published on:00:00:00